Comments on: Possible bug in 1.0.4b3 tag of turbogears http://blog.tplus1.com/index.php/2008/01/10/possible-bug-in-104b3-tag-of-turbogears/ Programming, gardening, economics, life in Cleveland Heights Sat, 04 Feb 2012 03:03:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: matt http://blog.tplus1.com/index.php/2008/01/10/possible-bug-in-104b3-tag-of-turbogears/comment-page-1/#comment-762 matt Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:06:47 +0000 http://blog.tplus1.com/index.php/2008/01/10/possible-bug-in-104b3-tag-of-turbogears/#comment-762 Marius: Thanks for pointing out that I could have used reversed instead of a copy and an in-place reverse. I keep forgetting about reversed. Florent: I am now running the svn 1.0 branch it works beautifully. I'll post a ticket into trac and then follow up on my original post. Marius: Thanks for pointing out that I could have used reversed instead of a copy and an in-place reverse. I keep forgetting about reversed.

Florent: I am now running the svn 1.0 branch it works beautifully. I’ll post a ticket into trac and then follow up on my original post.

]]> By: Marius Gedminas http://blog.tplus1.com/index.php/2008/01/10/possible-bug-in-104b3-tag-of-turbogears/comment-page-1/#comment-761 Marius Gedminas Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:22:23 +0000 http://blog.tplus1.com/index.php/2008/01/10/possible-bug-in-104b3-tag-of-turbogears/#comment-761 Is there any reason you can't do for item in reversed(self._get_soClasses()): and have to use copy.copy() instead? Is there any reason you can’t do

for item in reversed(self._get_soClasses()):

and have to use copy.copy() instead?

]]> By: Florent Aide http://blog.tplus1.com/index.php/2008/01/10/possible-bug-in-104b3-tag-of-turbogears/comment-page-1/#comment-760 Florent Aide Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:33:02 +0000 http://blog.tplus1.com/index.php/2008/01/10/possible-bug-in-104b3-tag-of-turbogears/#comment-760 Hi Matt, please test the SVN (branch 1.0, revision 3866 or upper) which has a lot of fixes regarding the first error (encode_utf8). I'll release 1.0.4b4 on Saturday night. If you find some problem you'll have time to ping me back. Regarding the second issue, please could you post a ticket in our trac system with the proposed patch, and ping me back in the ML by answering the original thread with the ticket id. I _really_ have no time to work on this right now. I would have loved to release 1.0.4b4 nearly one month ago already. I swear I'll look at this and apply it if it works :) This way you'll get all the fixes in the next release. Cheers, Florent Aide. Hi Matt,

please test the SVN (branch 1.0, revision 3866 or upper) which has a lot of fixes regarding the first error (encode_utf8). I’ll release 1.0.4b4 on Saturday night. If you find some problem you’ll have time to ping me back.

Regarding the second issue, please could you post a ticket in our trac system with the proposed patch, and ping me back in the ML by answering the original thread with the ticket id. I _really_ have no time to work on this right now. I would have loved to release 1.0.4b4 nearly one month ago already. I swear I’ll look at this and apply it if it works :)

This way you’ll get all the fixes in the next release.

Cheers,
Florent Aide.

]]>